Legal Opinion

McMahan v. Koppers Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 28, 1981No. 80-7911PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Floy Inez Poulos appeals from the denial of her motion to intervene in an action brought by Betty S. McMahan against Koppers Company, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Koppers”) for the wrongful death of her husband, Paul Nathan McMahan. We affirm, but for reasons other than those articulated by the district court.

Poulos claims that Paul McMahan was the natural father of her son, Michael E. Poulos. She therefore contends that Michael is entitled to a portion of any recovery obtained by Mrs. McMahan in her suit against Koppers. This assertion forms the basis of her motion to intervene pursuant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sherwin S. Stern v. United States Gypsum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  2. Watkins v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1977
  3. Lawrence v. WhittleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Boggan v. BogganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Betty S. McMahan as Widow of Paul Nathan McMahan Decedent v. Koppers Company, Inc. v. Floy Inez Poulos, as Next Friend and Natural Guardian of Michael E. Poulos, Movant for Intervention-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API