Legal Opinion

Doering v. Hinrichs

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWits chief, J.

The petitioner seeks an order under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act directing the respondents to reinstate petitioner as clerk in the department of public works of the city of New Rochelle as of May 1, 1941, and requiring payment of his salary since that date. While the facts are not made very clear either by the petition or answer, it appears that the petitioner was originally appointed as cost clerk in 1917. On December 15, 1928, he resigned. On July 16, 1929, the local municipal civil service commission adopted a rule by which the.title of the position was changed to that of clerk. On…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Marcus v. IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Schwartz v. BrandtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Girard v. Board of Education of City School District of City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Doering v. HinrichsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API