Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Pierce

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 22, 1991No. H008510PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J.

Patrick Duane Murphy (driver) claims it is unconstitutionally unfair that he faces a four-month suspension of his driver’s license by the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) for his first drunk driving offense when he would face only a one-month suspension followed by a five-month restriction if he had a commercial driver’s license. The superior court agreed, finding this legislative distinction a denial of equal protection because it lacks a rational basis. The court ordered A. A. Pierce, as Director of the DMV, to either reinstate driver’s driving privilege or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. Eric J.California Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hernandez v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re DemergianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Peretto v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. People v. Arthur W.California Court of Appeal · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. GourleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Lockett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
  3. Danny Ray Mitchell v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API