Murphy v. Pierce
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J.
Patrick Duane Murphy (driver) claims it is unconstitutionally unfair that he faces a four-month suspension of his driver’s license by the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) for his first drunk driving offense when he would face only a one-month suspension followed by a five-month restriction if he had a commercial driver’s license. The superior court agreed, finding this legislative distinction a denial of equal protection because it lacks a rational basis. The court ordered A. A. Pierce, as Director of the DMV, to either reinstate driver’s driving privilege or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. Eric J.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Hernandez v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re DemergianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Peretto v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- People v. Arthur W.California Court of Appeal · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hamilton v. GourleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Lockett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
- Danny Ray Mitchell v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2024