Legal Opinion

In re Michlin

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 24, 1958No. 6373PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWoelet, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the final rejection by the Primary Examiner of claims 94, 95, and 97 to 100, inclusive, of appellant’s application for a patent on a method of and apparatus for producing luminescent images. 1STo claims were allowed.

While the notice of appeal also alleged error in the board’s decision affirming the examiner’s rejection of claim 96, that claim is not included in the record and is not mentioned in the statement of errors relied on in appellant’s brief. Accordingly, the appeal as to claim 96…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Kalten-BachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  2. Application of ArbeitCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  3. In re StattmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  4. In re GreggCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  5. In re MasonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cross Medical Products, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Lutron Electronics Co. v. Crestron Electronics, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2013
  3. East Coast Sheet Metal Fabricating Corp. v. AutodeskDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API