Legal Opinion

Hargrove v. City of Bakersfield

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 7, 2019No. 1:17-cv-01743Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TATYANA HARGROVE, ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-1743 JLT ) 12 Plaintiffs, ) ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE ) 13 v. ) (Docs. 49, 51, 52, 53) ) 14 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al., ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 17 Plaintiffs and Defendants now bring motions in limine to establish the evidence that may be 18 offered at trial. 19 I. Legal Standards Governing Motions in Limine 20 “Although the Federal Rules of Evidence do not explicitly authorize in limine rulings, the 21 practice has developed pursuant to the district court’s inherent…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Hardin v. StraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Lawrence R. Sperberg v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  4. Barbara R. Jonasson, Jeanne Norgren, Patricia Twohill v. Lutheran Child and Family Services, Doing Business as Lutherbrook Children's Center SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Liston v. County of RiversideCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API