Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.111(e) & 3.800

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 12, 1999No. 95,707Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

QUINCE, J,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I agree with the majority that Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111(e), Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b), Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.020(h), Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140, and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.600 should be amended as outlined above. However, I cannot agree with the majority’s decision to amend Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).

Rule 3.800(a), in one form or another, has been a part of Florida’s criminal jurisprudence since 1968; the original rule was adopted March 1,1967,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Troupe v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. Cheshire v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. Goene v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Ricks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API