Legal Opinion

Ford v. United Fruit Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 17, 1948No. 11935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BOWEN, District Judge.

Appellant, Earl David Ford, on April 28, 1945, was employed as a messman and member of the crew of the merchant vessel S.S. Sea Perch owned and operated by the United States, with United Fruit Company assisting in the operation. On that date the vessel was at Esperitos Santos, New Hebrides, embarking a large number of troops, and while appellant was sitting on the ship’s rail facing outboard, watching the loading operations, he was accidentally “bumped” by one of two seamen engaged in innocent “horseplay” in the passageway behind the railing and fell to the dock below…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meintsma v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  2. Stetson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  3. Bornhurst v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  4. Heder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fiamengo v. The San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API