Braddy v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
The original suit was in the usual form of a suit on a promissory note, and when the amendments were allowed the suit was on an “indebitatus-assumpsit count” for one debt, and only one — a single indebtedness. The petition alleged that the defendants were indebted to the plaintiff in a named sum on the unsealed note, on an account stated, and on a pre-existing debt on a written contract which had been fully performed on the plaintiff’s side, and nothing was to be done except for the defendants to make a money payment. Tumlin v. Bass Furnace Co., 93 Ga. 594, 599 (20 S. E. 44). The amendments…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kraft v. Rowland & RowlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Tumlin v. Bass Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Cody v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Hancock v. RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
- Bartow Guano Co. v. AdairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.