Legal Opinion

Braddy v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 19, 1943No. 29804Published

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

The original suit was in the usual form of a suit on a promissory note, and when the amendments were allowed the suit was on an “indebitatus-assumpsit count” for one debt, and only one — a single indebtedness. The petition alleged that the defendants were indebted to the plaintiff in a named sum on the unsealed note, on an account stated, and on a pre-existing debt on a written contract which had been fully performed on the plaintiff’s side, and nothing was to be done except for the defendants to make a money payment. Tumlin v. Bass Furnace Co., 93 Ga. 594, 599 (20 S. E. 44). The amendments…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kraft v. Rowland & RowlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Tumlin v. Bass Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. Cody v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Hancock v. RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
  5. Bartow Guano Co. v. AdairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API