Legal Opinion

Opinion No. 78-216 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided August 10, 1978Published

1Opinion of the Court

ELECTIONS The provisions of 26 O.S. 15-111 [26-15-111] and 26 O.S. 16-122 [26-16-122] (1977) have no application to the individual acts or conduct of a candidate. The subject provisions apply only to the enumerated acts of persons or organizations other than the individual candidate. 26 O.S. 15-111 [26-15-111] and 26 O.S. 16-122 [26-16-122], apply only to campaign literature, i.e., written or printed material. These sections have no application to nonwritten or nonprinted campaign advertisements such as those as may be broadcast, transmitted or communicated by means of radio or television.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Canon v. Justice CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Perry v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. In Re Arbuckle Master Conservancy Dist, District Ct., Murray Cty., No 9660Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  4. Mook v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API