Legal Opinion

Associated Developers Co. v. Infanger

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1962No. 9065PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Justice.

Appellant brought this action to compel respondents’ specific performance of a contract requiring execution by them of *161deeds to real property and delivery to an escrow holder, or in the alternative for damages. On respondents’ motion, additional parties were brought in as cross-defendants. Respondents by answer denied the material allegations of the complaint, and by cross claim sought damages against appellant.

The trial court at the conclusion of trial entered its findings of fact and conclusions of law, followed by its judgment denying relief to appellant, quieting…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Huggins v. Green Top Dairy Farms, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Kerr v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Kessler v. PruittIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Abercrombie v. StoddardIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Leaf v. CoddIdaho Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ervin Construction Co. v. Van OrdenIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Pueblo v. Meléndez CartagenaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1977
  3. Ellis v. ButterfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Bob Daniels and Sons v. WeaverIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. People v. IsenorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API