State v. Wylie
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant and two others were indicted by the grand jury of Ramsey county charged with the crime of grand larceny in the second degree, Defendant Wylie was tried separately in the district court for that county before Hanft, J., and a jury which found him guilty as charged in the indictment. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, he appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
Appellant was indicted jointly with Jungbauer and Pitzenberger, charged with the larceny of eight pairs of window curtains, of the value of $108, the property of G-. Sommers & Company, a corporation. He was tried separately and convicted of grand larceny in the second degree. From an order denying his motion for a new trial upon the ground that the verdict is not justified by the evidence, of errors in the rulings upon the admissibility of evidence and upon newly discovered evidence, he appeals.
The Sommers Company conducts a catalogue wholesale house in the city of St. Paul. It does an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. . RazeziczNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- State v. NewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- State v. McLarneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Caldwell v. BruggermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
- State v. GrearSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Meyers v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Nicholas Lee Hill, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940