Legal Opinion
Napoli v. Crovello
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 18, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
“The Supreme Court is vested with broad discretion in supervising disclosure, and its determination will not be disturbed absent an improvident exercise of that discretion” (Nieves v City of New York, 35 AD3d 557, 558 [2006]). Here, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion of the defendant Ellen Kanner (hereinafter Dr. Kanner) pursuant to CPLR 3124 to compel the plaintiff to provide an authorization pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (42 USC § 1320d et seq.) for the release of the plaintiffs psychiatric treatment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dillenbeck v. HessNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Scalone v. Phelps Memorial Hospital CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Nieves v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Goldberg v. FenigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Cottrell v. WeinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jones v. LeFrance Leasing Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Keith v. Forest Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Sparks Associates, LLC v. North Hills Holding Co. II, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Euba v. EubaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- MacDonell v. PHH Mortgage Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012