Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Smith v. Walls

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 1, 2002No. 00 C 1814PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BUCKLO, District Judge.

Clayborn Smith filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, on March 24, 2000. The State filed a motion to dismiss Mr. Smith’s petition as untimely, which I initially denied, then granted on reconsideration. I issued a certificate of appealability on the timeliness of his petition, and the Seventh Circuit held that, under the rule announced in Artuz v. Bennett, 531 U.S. 4, 121 S.Ct. 361, 148 L.Ed.2d 213 (2000), Mr. Smith’s petition was timely. See Smith v. Walls, 276 F.3d 340, 345 (7th Cir.2002). On remand, I consider Mr.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. BoudreauAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  2. Smith v. BoudreauAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API