Faron v. Tynan
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
CLARIE, District Judge.
RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A THREE-JUDGE COURT
This action, on behalf of the plaintiffs and others similarly situated, was commenced pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. It requests the convening of a three-judge court, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2281, 2284, to test *12the constitutional validity of the Connecticut Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Act, Conn.Gen.Stat. § 14-113 et seq. and seeks a declaratory judgment with permanent injunctive relief declaring that the aforesaid state law is unconstitutional. It requests that the injunctive order issued should restrain the defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Dempsey v. TynanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- MacQuarrie v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- MacQuarrie v. McLaughlinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.