Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Apicella, 1091436 (Ala. 5-13-2011)

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 13, 2011No. 1091436PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODALL, Justice.

Andrew Anthony Apicella petitioned this Court for the writ of certiorari, which we granted for the limited purpose of determining whether the Court of Criminal Appeals’ judgment, insofar as it affirmed the trial court’s decision to strike Apicella’s third amended petition for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., conflicts with prior caselaw. We hold that the Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision does conflict with Ex parte Rhone, 900 So.2d 455 (Ala.2004). Therefore, we reverse the Court of Criminal Appeals’ judgment and remand the case to that court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. Ex Parte ApicellaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. City of Hampton v. Iowa Civil Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  4. Walker v. TraughberCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  5. Record Data Intern., Inc. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bryant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  2. Ingram v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  3. Apicella v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  4. Pickett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  5. Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API