Legal Opinion
Grady v. Sheehan
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 29, 1917No. Appeal, No. 172PublishedCited by 34 opinions
Appeal, No. 172, Jan. T., 1916, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Philadelphia Co., Sept. T., 1912, No. 1367, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Mary A. Grady, Administratrix of the Estate of Thomas F. Grady, Deceased, v. Mary Sheehan. Assumpsit to recover part of assets of decedent’s estate. Verdict for plaintiff for $2,533.49 and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed. Error assigned, among others, was in dismissing defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned court below dismissing the motion for judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto.
2Cited by34 opinions
- Mardis, Administratrix v. SteenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Scanlon's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Mader v. StemlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- American Oil Co. v. FalconerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Onofrey v. WolliverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.