Legal Opinion

Bingham v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided October 8, 1927No. Docket No. 8823Published

The petitioner regularly reported his income on the basis of cash received and disbursed. Various companies of which he was an ordinary stockholder declared dividends payable either on December 30 or 31, 1922, and mailed dividend checks to him on those days.

Read the full summary

The petitioner regularly reported his income on the basis of cash received and disbursed. Various companies of which he was an ordinary stockholder declared dividends payable either on December 30 or 31, 1922, and mailed dividend checks to him on those days. He was unable to receive these checks in the ordinary and usual course of business until 1923 and was not required by the provisions of section 201(e) of the Revenue Act of 1921 to report the amount of the dividends as part of his income for the calendar year 1922.

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT W. BINGHAM, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Bingham v. Commissioner

Docket No. 8823.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

8 B.T.A. 603; 1927 BTA LEXIS 2831;

October 8, 1927, Promulgated

The petitioner regularly reported his income on the basis of cash received and disbursed. Various companies of which he was an ordinary stockholder declared dividends payable either on December 30 or 31, 1922, and mailed dividend checks to him on those days. He was unable to receive these checks in the ordinary and usual course of business until 1923 and was not required by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bingham v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API