Legal Opinion

Ralph Michael Lepiscopo v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 29, 1972No. 72-2958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is taken from the denial of a motion to vacate the conviction and sentence 1 of Ralph Michael Lepiscopo, a federal prisoner. We affirm.

Appellant contends that he is entitled to § 2255 relief because the district court refused to appoint a fellow inmate “jailhouse lawyer” to represent him at his second trial. On retrial after a reversal by this Court, 2 Lepiscopo was again convicted and that judgment was affirmed on direct appeal. United States v. Lepiscopo, 5th Cir. 1970, 429 F.2d 258, cert. denied 1970, 400 U.S. 948, 91 S.Ct. 255, 27 L.Ed.2d 254.

The district court stated findings…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Ben Lee Brown v. Walter E. CravenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leona Weber, in Behalf of John R. Zimmerman and Billie Zimmerman, Petitioner v. Rudy Garza, U. S. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Thomas Hahn v. Maurice McLey Arnold Dischler and Officer Andy Anderson, Thomas Hahn v. Maurice McLey Arnold Dischler and Officer Andy AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. CorriganDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1975
  4. Dooley v. QuickDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API