Legal Opinion

W. H. Beard Dredging Co. v. Hughes

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 27, 1902PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Admiralty. Action to recover charter hire and damages.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, District Judge.

This is an action brought to recover «some unpaid hire and damages for a breach of a charter of the libel-ant’s dredge Samson and three scows, known as Nos. 1, 2, and 3; also for damages alleged to have been caused to two of the scows *681by the negligent maimer in which they -were used. The charter was a verbal one, confirmed by a letter dated March 9, 1901, as follows:

“'¿less. Hughes Bros. & Bangs, 3 Madison Av., N. X. — Gentlemen: W<> herewith confirm Hie verbal agreement made on the 8th inst. with your Air. Morrison, which was as follows: We agree to furnish the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Smith v. BoukerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1891
  4. Hastorf v. MooreDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thompson v. WinslowDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1904
  2. The Johnson Lighterage Co. No. 24Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918
  3. The Johnson Lighterage Co. No. 24District Court, D. New Jersey · 1917
  4. North Atlantic Dredging Co. v. McAllister Steamboat Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
  5. William H. Beard Dredging Co. v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API