Legal Opinion

United States v. Moore

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 1, 2011No. 09-5935PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THAPAR, District Judge.

Defendant Martino Moore, a four-time convicted felon, possessed a firearm one night in 2007. That event carried with it serious ramifications. It meant as an Armed Career Criminal he was subject to a mandatory minimum penalty of 180 months’ imprisonment. Moore argues on appeal that the imposition of this mandatory minimum sentence, as applied to him, violates the Eighth Amendment. We disagree and thus affirm.

I

On March 9, 2007, Memphis police responded to a call about an assault. At the scene, police interviewed Precious Jackson. She claimed that her boyfriend…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. ReingoldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. George RafidiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. Willie SomervilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  5. Romero v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API