Stautzenberger v. Stautzenberger
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentPaul E. Danielson, Justice
While I too would affirm on the Rule 60 issue, I would reverse and remand for entirely different reasons with respect to the disallowance of expenditures. I therefore respectfully concur in part and dissent in part.
First, I agree that the circuit court was within its discretion in modifying its previous order. Under Ark. R. Civ. P. 60(a) (2012), a circuit court may, within ninety days, modify or vacate a judgment, order, or decree, on its own motion or that of any party, with prior notice to all parties, “[t]o correct errors or mistakes or to prevent the miscarriage of justice.” The only…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Coleman v. Regions BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Lord v. MazzanatiSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- RLI Insurance v. CoeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- McCuen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Seymour v. BiehslichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.