Legal Opinion

In re Birrell

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBirdie Amsterdam, J.

This proceeding has been brought under subdivision 1 of section 4 of the Business Bent Law (L. 1945, ch. 314, as amd.), to increase the rent of business space. The area involved constitutes a doctor’s office at premises No. 1050 Park Avenue, in the borough of Manhattan, city of New York.

The building is a 14-s'tory penthouse and basement structure, with two passenger and two service elevators, situate at the southwest corner of Park Avenue and Bast 87th Street, on a plot fronting 100'8%" on the Avenue and 133'4" on 87th Street. Otherwise a residential building, four of the five units on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Alibel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fifty Mark Realty Corp. v. HermanNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. In re BirrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API