Legal Opinion

Montgomery County Bank v. Marsh

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1851PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This action was brought upon two promissory notes, made by Loucks & Gray, payable three months after date, to the order of Peter G. Loucks, and indorsed by him and the defendant, Seymour E. Marsh; the one note payable at the Bank of the State of New-York, in the city of New-York, for $1000 ; the other payable at the Montgomery County Bank for $800. The notes were dated May 2,1848. The defendant denied the receipt of notice of protest as to both notes, and one question was as…

Read the full summary

This action was brought upon two promissory notes, made by Loucks & Gray, payable three months after date, to the order of Peter G. Loucks, and indorsed by him and the defendant, Seymour E. Marsh; the one note payable at the Bank of the State of New-York, in the city of New-York, for $1000 ; the other payable at the Montgomery County Bank for $800. The notes were dated May 2,1848. The defendant denied the receipt of notice of protest as to both notes, and one question was as to the sufficiency of the service of notice. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. With respect to the $800…

1Opinion of the CourtWillard, P. J.

The plaintiffs sued as holders of a promissory note, dated at Canajoharie, May 2, 1848, and made by Loucks & Gray, payable three months after date to the order of Peter G. Loucks, for $1000, at the Bank of the State of New-York, in New-York city. It was indorsed by Peter G. Loucks, the payee, and by the defendant, Seymour E. Marsh. The present question arises between the plaintiffs and Seymour E. Marsh, who was the second indorser. The question as to the above note is, whether a notice of protest, addressed to him at Canajoharie, was a good service, his residence being at the time in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  2. US Bank v. PLANTERS'BANKSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Commercial & Railroad Bank of Vicksburg v. Slocomb, Richards & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1840
  4. Bank of Columbia Ex Rel. Bank of United States v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  5. Remer v. DownerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1840

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howland v. . WillettsNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  2. Thompson v. McLeanNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Bergen County Mutual Assurance Ass'n v. ColeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1857

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API