Legal Opinion

United States v. Standard Silk Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 18, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, District Judge.

This is a suit by the United States to-■recover $31,661.75, alleged to have been erroneously and unlawfully paid to the defendant, with interest from January 14,. 1930. The action was tried before a jury of one, and at the close of the case both-sides asked for a directed verdict.

On April 1, 1918, the defendant filed its 1917 tax return, and thereafter paid a tax of $140,879.87. Subsequently, and on January 24, 1921, the defendant executed and filed an unlimited assessment waiver. This waiver was 'approved in writing by the Commissioner on March 7, 1923; and by a later…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stange v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Wisconsin Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Aiken v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Burnet v. Howes Bros. Hide Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Onondaga Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. MarksDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API