Legal Opinion

Jeffrey Fairbanks v. State of Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 2019No. Supreme Court Case 18S-CR-604PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rush, Chief Justice.

In criminal cases, Indiana Evidence Rule 404(b)'s purpose is to prevent the jury from indulging in the "forbidden inference"-that a defendant must be guilty of the charged crime because, on other occasions, he acted badly. To achieve this purpose, Rule 404(b) prohibits the State from introducing evidence of other bad acts to show a defendant's propensity to commit a crime. But the Rule permits this evidence for other purposes, including to show "lack of accident."

*566 Here, to prove that the death of Jeffrey Fairbanks's infant daughter was not an accident, the State introduced…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chavez v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Hicks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. United States v. Jamal T. MerriweatherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. Hardin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Wickizer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Levetta Tunstall v. Dawn ManningIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
  2. AIDAN C. BURKINS v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. Ajaylan M Shabazz v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025
  4. Auralea Till v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Benito Pedraza v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API