United States v. Wright
Supreme Court of the United States
error to' the district court of the united states por THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. The facts, which involve the construction of the various acts relating to the introduction of intoxicating liquor into Indian country in Oklahoma, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney
The defendant in error was indicted’ in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma, the charge being that — "on the nineteenth day of March, in the year 1912, in the County of Muskogee, in the said District, and within the jurisdiction of said court, the said county and district then and there being a portion of the Indian country of the said United States, (he) did at the time and place aforesaid, unlawfully, wilfully, knowingly, and feloniously introduce into said Indian country one quart of malt, vinous, spirituous, distilled, ardent, and intoxicating liquor,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. PattenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. PelicanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States v. NiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Joplin Mercantile Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.