Legal Opinion · Dissent

America v. Mills

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 8, 2011No. 10-5244Published

1DissentBrown, J.

The district court’s unchallenged findings of fact are incompatible with its conclusion that the Small Business Administration did not materially breach its settlement agreement with Richard America. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

To get America to drop his discrimination and retaliation claims, SBA agreed to refer “all inquiries from prospective employers” to Human Resources. The purpose of this agreement was, the district court found, “to ensure that the SBA provided only neutral references.” America v. Mills, 714 F.Supp.2d 88, 101 (D.D.C. 2010). An SBA employee therefore materially…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lankford v. Platte Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Draim v. Virtual Geosatellite Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  3. America v. MillsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API