Evonik Degussa GmbH v. Materia, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HILLMAN, District Judge:
Presently before the Court is Defendant Materia’s remaining invalidity counterclaim:' the asserted' indefiniteriess of claims 8-10 of Plaintiff Evonik’s ’528 patent. In January, 2017, the Court held a jury trial on the issues of lack of enablement, lack of an' adequate written description, willfulness of Materia’s infringement, and damages. The jury found for Evonik on both invalidity counterclaims, and awarded damages to Evonik for Materia’s infringement of the ’528 patent, but found for Materia on the issue of the willfulness of that infringement. The parties…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- United Carbon Co. v. Binney & Smith Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.