Legal Opinion

Settlemyer v. Wilmington Veterans Post No. 49, American Legion, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1984No. 83-812PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Per curiam

The determinative question presented for our review is whether plaintiff-appellant’s complaint sets forth a maintainable cause of action under Ohio law.

In Mason v. Roberts (1973), 33 Ohio St. 2d 29 [62 O.O.2d 346], we held in the syllabus as follows:

“1. R.C. 4399.01, commonly known as the Dram Shop Act, does not provide the exclusive remedy against a liquor permit holder, to recover damages for the death of a bar patron.
“2. The proprietor of a business establishment wherein alcoholic beverages are dispensed for consumption upon the premises owes a duty to members of the public while they are…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Coulter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Wiener v. Gamma Phi Chapter of Alpha Tau Omega FraternityOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Mason v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  5. F. Enterprises, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Burkhart v. HarrodWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Millross v. Plum Hollow Golf ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  3. DiOssi v. MaroneySupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  4. Great Central Insurance v. TobiasOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. McGuiggan v. NEW ENGLAND TEL. & TEL. CO. PEABODYMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API