Legal Opinion

Wynock v. Carroll

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 28, 1986No. 0688PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, Judge:

The complaint of Richard A. Wynock and Marie F. Wy-nock (the plaintiffs) alleged two causes of action against Carroll (the defendant), viz., (1) an action for nuisance seeking actual and punitive damages and (2) injunctive relief requiring the defendant to alter or remove a part of a parking facility in order to conform with the building code of the City of Myrtle Beach. The jury awarded the plaintiffs one dollar actual damages and $25,000 punitive damages in the tort case. The matter of injunction was then heard and the trial judge enjoined and restrained the defendants from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hunnicutt v. RickenbackerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Aiken v. ColeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API