Legal Opinion

Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Granite Construction Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 1964No. Civ. 10718PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

Plaintiff sued defendants for damages to its cable allegedly caused by negligence and trespass and for costs incurred in relocating the cable. Judgment was for plaintiff and defendants have appealed from said judgment.

Appellants contend that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment. Where the attack on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence, “the appellate court must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, giving him the benefit of every reasonable inference, and resolving conflicts in support of the judgment.” (3 Witkin, Cal. Procedure, § 84,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. County of Alameda v. TieslauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Young v. HoaglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Lloyd v. KleefischCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Gay v. EngebretsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sprint Communications Co. v. Western Innovations, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API