Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Vacancy in Judgeship No. 6

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 2017No. 20170158Published

1DissentCrothers, Justice

[¶12] I respectfully disagree with the Court’s conclusion that Judgeship No. 6 with chambers in Grafton should be retained and filled under N.D.C.C. eh. 27-25. I would transfer the judgeship to the Northeast Central Judicial District with chambers in Grand Forks. I acknowledge such a transfer would create a judge surplus in the Northeast Central Judicial District. However, the appointment of Presiding Judge Jensen to this Court soon will create another vacancy in that judicial, district.

[¶13] In proceedings regarding the impending vacancy in Grand Forks, I would provide notice that the Court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Judicial Vacancy in District Judgeship No. 6North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In re Change the Resident Chambers for District Judgeship No. 7, Northwest Judicial DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API