Legal Opinion
Portman v. Garbade
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided September 20, 1999No. 3048PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
After Rehearing, the Court withdraws the previously filed opinion and substitutes the attached opinion.
HUFF, Judge:
Barnard M. Portman, Gary D. Brown, Donald V. Barkowitz and Michael K. Gardner (Attorneys) brought this action seeking partition of land in which they claim they owned a percentage of the interest of their former clients, (Garbades). The trial court granted the Garbades’ Rule 12(b)(6), SCRCP motion. We affirm.
FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The Attorneys represented the Garbades in a will contest that was finally decided in their favor by the South Carolina Supreme Court in Garbade…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Biales v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- In the Matter of MorrisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Food Mart v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Owens v. Atlantic Coast Lumber Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
- Columbia (SC) Teachers Federal Credit Union v. Newsome Chevrolet-BuickCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kelaher, Connell & Conner, P.C. v. SC Workers' Compensation CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021