Shell Oil Company v. Ed Hoppe Realty Inc.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBat jer, J.
I respectfully dissent from that part of the majority opinion which affirms Hoppe’s judgment against Shell, but concur in that part of the majority opinion affirming the judgment in favor of Husky and against Hoppe. Viewing it in its most favorable light, the evidence which purports to support the trial court’s finding fails to establish a brokerage contract between Hoppe and Shell.
Hoppe had one direct contact with Shell. That was “about a five minute” conversation with a representative of Shell whose name he could not remember and whose recommendation *582Hoppe admitted would have to be approved…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zeligson v. Hartman-Blair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
- Ira Garson Realty Co. v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- O'Donnell v. . CarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Bennett v. H. K. Porter Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Johns v. Ambrose-Williams & Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1957