Byrd v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge.
A jury found Anthony Byrd guilty of aggravated battery. Citing insufficiency of the evidence and alleged juror misconduct, Byrd moved for a new trial, which after two evidentiary hearings was denied. He appeals on the same grounds. Discerning no error, we affirm.
1. Regarding sufficiency of the evidence, an appellate court does not weigh the evidence nor determine witness credibility but only determines whether the evidence is sufficient under the standard of Jackson v. Virginia, 1 i.e., whether a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Tharpe v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
- Ganas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Crawford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Grace v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Goldsby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
- Byers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
- Ferrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Garza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.