Legal Opinion

Freeland v. Wright

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 24, 1891PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Bill IN equity, filed in the Superior Court, to redeem a parcel of land in Sutton from a mortgage. The case was referred to a master, and, upon the coming in of his report, the Superior Court made a decree that the plaintiff should have possession of the land upon payment of a certain sum to the defendant; and the plaintiff, being dissatisfied therewith, appealed to this court. The case, so far as material to the points decided, appears in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, J.

This is a bill in equity, brought to redeem a mortgage of real estate. The plaintiff filed exceptions to the master’s report, and then moved that the master be required to report all the evidence taken at the hearing, and appealed from the order of the court denying the motion. She afterwards asked that issues be framed for a jury, and appealed from the refusal of the court to frame issues, and finally took an appeal from the final decree.

1. The exceptions to the master’s report present no question of law; they all relate to findings of fact which cannot be revised without a report of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parker v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  2. Atlanta Mills v. MasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. Nichols v. ElaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. East Tennessee Land Co. v. LeesonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  2. Haskell v. MerrillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. Henderson v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  4. Taber v. BreckMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  5. Bowers v. CutlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API