American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Winback & Conserve Program, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.
In this case, the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (“AT & T”) seeks to hold the defendants-appellees — Winback and Conserve Program, Inc. (“Winback”) and Alphonse G. Inga — liable for acts of unfair competition by the defendants’ sales representatives. The district court, in an Opinion and Order dated May 12, 1994, denied AT & T’s application for a preliminary injunction, finding that Winback and Inga exerted insufficient control over the sales representatives to justify the imposition of liability upon Win-back and Inga. AT & T v. Winback…
2Cases cited85 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Winback And Conserve Program, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Cooper Univ Hosp v. Secretary HHSCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- SUNBELT RENTALS, INC. v. LOVEDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021