Legal Opinion

American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Winback & Conserve Program, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 9, 1994No. 94-5305UnknownCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.

In this case, the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (“AT & T”) seeks to hold the defendants-appellees — Winback and Conserve Program, Inc. (“Winback”) and Alphonse G. Inga — liable for acts of unfair competition by the defendants’ sales representatives. The district court, in an Opinion and Order dated May 12, 1994, denied AT & T’s application for a preliminary injunction, finding that Winback and Inga exerted insufficient control over the sales representatives to justify the imposition of liability upon Win-back and Inga. AT & T v. Winback…

2Cases cited85 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Winback And Conserve Program, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Cooper Univ Hosp v. Secretary HHSCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  3. SUNBELT RENTALS, INC. v. LOVEDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API