Legal Opinion

Fariello v. Checkmate Holdings, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 3, 2011PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The motion court erred by dismissing the quantum meruit claim. Accepting the allegations of the complaint as true (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]), plaintiff law firm was discharged without cause and thus, its remedy is “to recovert ] in quantum meruit the reasonable value of the services rendered” (Campagnola v Mulholland, Minion & Roe, 76 NY2d 38, 44 [1990]; see Nabi v Sells, 70 AD3d 252, 253 [2009]; Robert M. Simels, P.C. v Silver, 303 AD2d 322 [2003]). Because plaintiffs exclusive remedy is quantum meruit, the cause of action alleging breach of contract was properly…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. New York University v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Campagnola v. MulhollandNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Clearmont Property, LLC v. EisnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. 767 Third Avenue LLC v. Greble & Finger, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Security Plans, Inc. v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  2. Princes Point, LLC v. AKRF Engineering, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Pope Contr., Inc. v. New York City Hous. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  4. 2497 Realty Corp. v. FuertesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
  5. 2497 Realty Corp. v. FuertesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API