Legal Opinion

Poulos v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1959Published

1Opinion of the CourtCharles A. Loreto, J.

Motion by defendants Cavanagh’s Enterprises, Inc., and John J. Cavanagh, pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the second cause of action brought against them is granted, with leave to replead.

*500The complaint, as it relates to movants, seeks recovery of damages for personal injuries sustained by reason of the alleged negligence of these defendants in permitting the roadway in front of their premises to be dug, resulting in an unguarded trench into which the plaintiff, a pedestrian, fell.

It appears that this accident occurred on the roadway in a public street and that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Congreve v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Nickelsburg v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  3. McCutcheon v. National City BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  4. Massa v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  5. McCutcheon v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API