Legal Opinion
State v. Muckle
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 3, 2008No. 28108, 28109, 28110PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
Each of the defendants in these consolidated appeals, Robert Muckle, Stanley Scott and Maryann Sprague, was convicted, after a trial to the court, of disorderly conduct in violation of General Statutes § 53a-182 (a) (5) in connection with a demonstration at the Planned Parenthood of Connecticut (Planned Parenthood) facility in New Haven. On appeal, each of the defendants claims that the evidence was insufficient to establish that he or she either obstructed or intended to obstruct pedestrian traffic in violation of the statute. We affirm the judgments of the trial court.
These…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. IndrisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Zalaski v. City of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- State v. WinterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Zalaski v. City of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- State v. LittleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. MuckleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.