Legal Opinion

American Express Centurion v. Decker

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County

Decided September 17, 2009No. 2009-2517PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KISTLER, J,

Presently before this court are preliminary objections filed by Sarah Decker (defendant) on June 29, 2009. A hearing was scheduled for August 27,2009, and briefs were submitted by each party. After consideration of parties’ briefs, defendant’s preliminary objections are sustained.

DISCUSSION

I. Preliminary Objection Raising Failure of a Pleading To Conform to Law or Rule of Court — Pa.R.C.P. 1028(a)(2)

Defendant contends that American Express Centurion’s (plaintiff) pleading fails to conform to law or rule of court pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1028(a)(2). In particular, defendant argues that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Werner v. Plater-ZyberkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Corace v. BALINT (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Rambo v. GreeneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Weiss v. EquibankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Parsons Trading Co. v. DohanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. v. DenboerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2010
  2. Atlantic Credit & Finance, Inc. v. List, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County2011
  3. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Knepp, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clearfield County2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API