Legal Opinion
Maxwell v. Toys "R" US-NY Ltd. Partnership
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 22, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries in which a third-party action and a second third-party action were commenced, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that Royal Insurance is obligated to defend and indemnify the defendant third-party plaintiff James A. Smith Contracting, Inc., and the defendant second third-party plaintiff Toys “R” US-NY Ltd. Partnership in the main action, the third-party defendant second third-party defendant Royal Insurance appeals, as limited by its brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), dated November…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hartford Insurance v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- MATTER OF FIREMEN'S FUND INS. CO. OF NEWARK v. HopkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Tishman Construction Corp. v. CNA InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Lim v. Atlas-Gem Erectors Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Murphy v. Hanover InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pecker Iron Works of New York, Inc. v. Traveler's InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Lo BruttoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000