Legal Opinion

Duke University v. Bryant-Durham Electric Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 21, 1984No. 8314SC126PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendant BDR here attempts to appeal from an order denying its motion to dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because, defendant contends, this action must be a compulsory counterclaim in 80CVS89. We find that the order denying the motion to dismiss is an interlocutory order, and therefore we dismiss defendant’s appeal.

G.S. 1-277(a) provides that no appeal lies from an interlocutory order or ruling of a trial judge unless such ruling or order deprives appellant of a substantial right which he would lose if the ruling or order is not reviewed before final…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. North Carolina Consumers Power, Inc. v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Blackwelder v. State Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Atkins v. NashCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Shaver v. N. C. Monroe Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Corbin Russwin, Inc. v. Alexander's Hardware, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API