Legal Opinion

Swierad v. Swierad

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavid Kusnetz, J.

The plaintiff, in an action to declare the nullity of a judgment of divorce that the defendant obtained *869against her in the State of Alabama, moves for counsel fees pursuant to section 1169-a of the Civil Practice Act.

The defendant moves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that the plaintiff is precluded from questioning the validity of the aforesaid judgment of divorce because she appeared in the divorce action pursuant to a power of attorney which she executed and acknowledged on May 7, 1958 authorizing an attorney at law in the State of Alabama to submit her to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Averbuck v. AverbuckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  2. Bernstein v. KritzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  3. Boxer v. BoxerNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  4. La Barr v. La BarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  5. In re the Estate of MalloyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hartigan v. HartiganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  2. Holmes v. HolmesNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API