Legal Opinion

Joan Hansen & Co. v. Everlast World's Boxing Headquarters Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 2009PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Graffeo, J.

In this case, we hold that after issuance of an arbitration award, a party may not seek to reopen the arbitration proceeding to request that the arbitrators consider an issue that was not previously presented to the panel.

Everlast World’s Boxing Headquarters Corp. is a major seller of boxing-related merchandise and athletic apparel. In 1983, Everlast hired Joan Hansen & Co., Inc. as its independent licensing agent for the purpose of finding companies that would be interested in marketing goods bearing the Everlast name. This arrangement continued until the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hiscock v. . HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. In re the Arbitration between Denihan & DenihanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Denson v. Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  2. Matter of Slocum v. MadariagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Matter of 544 Bloomrest, LLC v. HardingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  4. Matter of 544 Bloomrest, LLC v. HardingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  5. Fiduciary Insurance v. American Bankers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API