Anderson v. Taurus Financial Corp.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, Circuit Judge.
The issues presented in this case are: (1) whether California or South Dakota law should apply to an agreement between Taurus Financial Corporation d/b/a Taurus Leasing Corporation (hereinafter Taurus) and Courtney W. Anderson (hereinafter Anderson) and (2) if South Dakota rather than California law should apply, whether the agreement constitutes a valid sale and leaseback agreement or is actually a loan in disguise to which the South Dakota usury laws must be applied.
RELEVANT FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Amongst its other financial enterprises, Taurus is involved in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Briggs v. United Services Life Insurance CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
- Kinney Loan & Finance Co. v. SumnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- Frank S. Blackford, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Munro-Van Helms Company v. Commercial Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Green v. Northwestern Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Barry v. StoverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. KeyserWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Meierhenry v. Spiegel, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Golden Plains Feedlot, Inc. v. Great Western Sugar Co.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1984