Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Taurus Financial Corp.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1978No. 12167PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Circuit Judge.

The issues presented in this case are: (1) whether California or South Dakota law should apply to an agreement between Taurus Financial Corporation d/b/a Taurus Leasing Corporation (hereinafter Taurus) and Courtney W. Anderson (hereinafter Anderson) and (2) if South Dakota rather than California law should apply, whether the agreement constitutes a valid sale and leaseback agreement or is actually a loan in disguise to which the South Dakota usury laws must be applied.

RELEVANT FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Amongst its other financial enterprises, Taurus is involved in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Briggs v. United Services Life Insurance CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Kinney Loan & Finance Co. v. SumnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Frank S. Blackford, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Munro-Van Helms Company v. Commercial Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  4. Green v. Northwestern Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Barry v. StoverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. KeyserWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State Ex Rel. Meierhenry v. Spiegel, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Golden Plains Feedlot, Inc. v. Great Western Sugar Co.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API