Legal Opinion

State v. Crisanti

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1996No. A95A1851PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Chief Judge.

Edward Crisanti was indicted for possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute in violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. OCGA § 16-13-30 (b). The State appeals from the trial court’s order granting Crisanti’s motion to suppress.

“When an appellate court reviews a trial court’s order concerning a motion to suppress evidence, the appellate court should be guided by three principles with regard to the interpretation of the trial court’s judgment of the facts. First, when a motion to suppress is heard by the trial judge, that judge sits as the trier of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BrannanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  2. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. State v. CrisantiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API