Legal Opinion
State v. Crisanti
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 15, 1996No. A95A1851PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Beasley, Chief Judge.
Edward Crisanti was indicted for possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute in violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. OCGA § 16-13-30 (b). The State appeals from the trial court’s order granting Crisanti’s motion to suppress.
“When an appellate court reviews a trial court’s order concerning a motion to suppress evidence, the appellate court should be guided by three principles with regard to the interpretation of the trial court’s judgment of the facts. First, when a motion to suppress is heard by the trial judge, that judge sits as the trier of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BrannanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- State v. CrisantiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996