Legal Opinion

Searcy v. Brandon

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

Complainant alleges that he executed a promissory note, dated January 16, 1930, payable and delivered to L. B. Stinnett, “for the sum of $691.22, due twelve months after date, and bearing interest from date, ’ ’ the consideration for said note being a certain house and lot conveyed by Stinnett to the maker; that following his execution of this note, Stinnett transferred it to defendant, Brandon; that complainant has heretofore made payments to defendant on said note, partly in cash and partly in work, totaling $387.70, for which he is entitled to credit thereon; that a lien was expressly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. John Gerber Co. v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Litterer v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Deaver v. J. C. Mahan Motor Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  4. First Nat. Bank v. BarbeeTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Stein v. FogartyIdaho Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Airline Construction, Inc. v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  2. Todd v. Third Nat. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Myrick v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
  4. Rundle v. Capitol Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
  5. Long v. RangeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API