Legal Opinion

Kernochan v. Murray

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1886Published

Alpeal from a judgment recovered on trial at the circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.

The action i—The s upon a guaranty executed and delivered to the plaintiff by De Mill & Co., by which they agreed with him:

“In consideration of your having purchased, upon my •representation as to their value, forty shares of the capital stock of the Albemarle Swamp Land Company, and of one dollar to me in hand paid, I do hereby guarantee that you shall receive, as long as you hold said stock, dividends equal to seven per cent per annum, or I will make good to you all deficit from such account.
“DE MILL & CO.
“New York, August 21, 1871.”

The company failed to pay dividends upon the stock, and an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  2. Walsh v. BailieNew York Supreme Court · 1813
  3. Bradley v. BurwellNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  4. Williams's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API