Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Adame

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 19, 1982No. 68836PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McCORMICK, Judge.

This is a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus in which applicant seeks relief from his conviction for the offense of theft. Applicant contends that the indictment under which he stands convicted is fundamentally defective for failing to allege that the property he appropriated was stolen by another. See V.T.C.A. Penal Code, Section 31.-03(b)(2).

The indictment, omitting the formal parts, alleges that applicant:

“. . . did then and there with intent to deprive the owner of property, did then and there unlawfully appropriate stolen property, to-wit: one typewriter, and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. American Plant Food Corporation v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Seaton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Childs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dennis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. Oliver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Kirk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Dennis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API